Skeleton Argument Template Assignment Sample

• Type Assignment
• Downloads1140
• Pages11

Introduction

Get free samples written by our Top-Notch subject experts for taking Assignment Helper services.

It is identified that self-defence and prevention of time originates from the number of different factors which are being provided by the business organisation for the Government of the countries. It is identified that the defence of a person is governed by common law in the country where defence of property however is governed by self-defence and prevention of crime act. It is identified that rest and prevention of crime are governed through the criminal law 1967. It is identified that often against person act 1861 is one of the most important acts which is passed by the parliament of the United Kingdom where it is the provisions that is related to the offences against the person. It identifies the act. Here it is considered that homicide attend to murder said to kill bodily, harm assault, rape child stealing abortion activity and other matters are identified under this act which helps in the various factors that are related to offence. In the current case battery is considered to be the person who is being enquired related to the self-defence over the trial where she appeals for her conviction on the basis of the following grounds of appeal. Here it is taken into consideration that there are various charges that are being imposed on Betty which did not allow Betty for self-defence as a claim for charges.

Summary of the facts of the case

This is taken into consideration that the current places related to sexual assault or is related to offence against the personnel act. Where it is identified better was considered to be one of the defendants who were a heavy smoker. It was identified that on one could find a she was looking for the cigarette but was not able to find it there, so she decided to visit a town so I could get the cigarettes. It was identified that Betty got a man where the man was having cigarettes with him who is known as Mike. It was identified that the batty asked the man to provide her the cigarette but he laughed at her and it was considered as denial by mike. On the other hand, Baati slapped the man on his face and due to this the man went off. While running off the man left the cigarettes behind which was better and a portrait and her pocket.

On the other hand she was arrested due to the fact that she was the cause but later on when she was released she decided to go to her brother's home. It was identified that while travelling to her brother's home she took a train where she met a man called Manish who she thought was very handsome and therefore she moved across the train to stand next to him. Minesh winged at her where it was identified that when the train jolted she grabbed hold of Manish court. The train arrived the next station and next tool to the station staff that she has been sexually assaulted by Betty.

On the hand the third keys that is related to better includes that she was heading to her home where she found that someone wants moving around the house she went into the living room and some and looking through the drawers cupboards full stop it was identified that there were various factors which were required to be considered for the same but she thought that he was a burglar so she picked up a vas and went to him where she hit him overhead which cause a cut on his head and started bleeding. It was identified that she was then again arrested by the police where she identified them the person whom she hit was a flatmate known as Stanley. it was identified that were various charges that were considered on betty which includes section 20 of assault against person act section 8 and sexual assault act contrary to section 3.

Grounds of appeal

This is identified as betting and appeal on the grounds of self-defence in prevention of crime where it is identified that self-defence in prevention of crime as one of the most important aspects which helps in guiding vertically related fences against the persons and homicides. It is taken into consideration that while reviewing the cases against assertion the self-defence or action and prevention of time, what reservation of property that should be considered that the public interest in promoting and responsible contribution on the part of it is in preserving why an order shouldn't be taken into account. Here it is identified that the guidance in the section should be considered with determining the code test taken into consideration.

It is identified that the National police chief council have published various public statements where they would be using the force in the circumstances where householders and the use of force against intruders are required. It is very much important to make this clear where householders have done what they honestly and distinctly think is necessary for doing. Therefore it is considered to be the best evidence for them where they would be working for self-defence. On the other hand at the time of viewing the cases there are various actions which need to be considered for the purpose of project balance to be struck.

On the other hand, it has been identified that at the time robing the cases which are involved in assertion of the self-defence are action in prevention of crime or reservation of property they should be a prospective which should be aware of the balance that is required to the strut. It is identified that the act for the public interest promoting a responsible contribution on part of it is that there should be a discouraging vigilance that is related to the violence generally.

It is identifying that a person may use such forces as reasonable in the circumstances where self-defence defence of another and defence of property are taken into consideration full term there are various factors which must be taken into account which includes prevention of crime and lawful arrest. On the other hand, it has been taken into account that in assessing the reasons for the force the prosecutor should ask the questions where they should use force necessarily in the circumstances where they should use the reasonable circumstances for the purpose of considering the factors.

It is taken into consideration that it is very much important to bear in mind at the time of assessing that the force that is being used is reasonable. This is taken into account that there are various factors which are required to be considered where in case of there has been any attack so that cell differences are reasonable and necessary then it would be considered and nice by that person defending himself. It is considered that one cannot know the exact measure of the defensive action. This is taken into account where it is considered necessary does not mean that it includes resulting action as a reasonable factor.

This is taken into consideration that it is important to wear in whether the force used was reasonable or not. It is also identified that there are various forms of immigration act. This is identifying the jury must consider and decide whether the degree of force used was greatly disproportionate or the degree of falls was not reasonable hence defence are self-defences not made out. Under another hand theory has concluded that whether the degree of force was considered to be not grocery disproportionate. Here it is taken into consideration that the solution is whether the degree of force was used and reasonable or in the circus. Here it is identified that the judge should explain about the weather today in the case of the householder. But it was clear that it was clear.

On the other hand section 8 A handsome providing differences where a person can come for the defence if they were acting for any other purpose such as protecting their property also these are considered to be the law which is being used at the reasonable for sale continue to apply in this circumstances. It is very much important to identify where they are not there to be considered from another trust parcel but which does not stop them being considered as a trespass. Heritage taken into consideration that there are various forms of criminal justice and immigration act which are being a weed where these help in considering the different aspects related to the same. This is also taken into consideration that there are various administration or other factors related to the same where the reason to homicide are also include the attempt murder these are used in the manner wear this in considered ring the various factors that are related to the same. It is taken into account that letters that are related to threatening of murder or considered as one of the most important aspect. On the other hand apps cause her tending to cause danger to life.

In the current case it was identified that better was facing the issue where she faced and I should related to the man who was considered ring I love at her where she use it as a self-defence purpose. Here it was identified that in the case of mines it was identified that the trains halted and for the purpose of self-protection she grabbed hold of the mines coat. On the hand it is taken into consideration that it was used for self-defence were this is considered that result into a severe injuries full stop therefore this is coming back today in a well reasonable circumstances. On the other hands the inflection of this was very superficial where manner injuries may have been product of simple good for June rather than intention. Under the hand they should be considered to be unreasonable by the finance with husband to the public interest.

On the other hand, this is taken into account with enough group names with the prosecution where the issue of cell differences is raised. On the other hand the prosecution must provide a reduced sufficient evidence source to satisfy theory beyond the reasonable doubt whether the defendant was either not acting to different himself or not acting to different property. It was also taken into consideration that if he was acting the force use was excessive.

On the other hand, self-defence should be considered as an absolute difference where it is related to public interest. It is taken into account that there are various cases in which cell differences are raised and there is no question test factor beyond those that need to be considered in everything. Ahmedabad and it is taken into concentration that there are various factors where these include involving self-defence with the prevention of the client.

Under the hand it is taken into account that where the final consequence of the action is taking where the degree of force used in the prevention of crime is Axis then this would be considered for the purpose of being excessive. It is also taken into consideration that 3 idiots violence would be considered as an act where this would be used for the purpose of generating better results. Also having the expectation of a violent situation would be considered for the purpose of identifying the same. The public interest factors set out in the earlier section will be specifically relevant whereas a matter of undisputed pack will be identified as a material time. These would be used for the purpose of considering the commission on a separate offence basis.

The apprehension of offender

Contrasting public interest points which help in considering the various factors related to the apprehension of offenders. On the one hand it is identified that the rule of law is one of the most important aspects for maintaining the violence discouragement where this is used for the purpose of the environment of citizens in prevention and investigation of clients. These are considered as one factor for the purpose of generating better results for those who act to extend me to circumstances where these are used as a purpose of radiation comment and would also be considered as a firm.

Therefore the above reports a conclusion that where any offence is being done against a person or where any self-defence is required then the government has created various rules which can be used for the purpose of offence against Person. This is also identified that with the use of offence against person these can be considered for the purpose of bringing defence where there are various forms of cases which can be used where one of the case hey Siri related to the householder case where one involving a householder the degree of force used by the household is not to be regarded as having been reasonable in circumstances as householder. It is therefore considered to be believed that the provision must be read in conjunction with the other element of section 76 of the act. Here it is also identified that Betty has done various crimes where she did not commit the actus reus and men's Rhea for sexual assault here it is very much important that the intention of the person must be there she only grabbed the coat for the purpose of not getting dropped.

Conclusion

Therefore through the above report a conclusion can be drawn that Betty has done various acts which can be used for the purpose of defence where the direction can be used as a purpose of self-defence. In the first instance it was identified that Betty slammed the man because it was considered as one of the acts where the man doubted her considering this as an offence against her. On the other hand in the second case she grabbed the coat only for the purpose of not getting herself injured and hence it is considered as one of the factor where she can use this case where she did not commit that actus Reus and means is a sexual assault. In the last case it is identified that she used this further purpose of getting the defence of self-defence where she was having a threat that she is getting robbed.

References

Amankwaa, A.O. and McCartney, C., 2018. The UK national DNA database: implementation of the protection of freedoms act 2012. Forensic Science International, 284, pp.117-128.

Bows, H. and Westmarland, N., 2017. Rape of older people in the United Kingdom: Challenging the real-rape’stereotype. British Journal of Criminology, 57(1), pp.1-17.

Buil-Gil, D., Miró-Llinares, F., Moneva, A., Kemp, S. and Díaz-Castaño, N., 2021. Cybercrime and shifts in opportunities during COVID-19: a preliminary analysis in the UK. European Societies, 23(sup1), pp.S47-S59.

Bunting, L., McCartan, C., McGhee, J., Bywaters, P., Daniel, B., Featherstone, B. and Slater, T., 2018. Trends in child protection across the UK: A comparative analysis. British Journal of Social Work, 48(5), pp.1154-1175.

Cooper, C., Hesketh, O., Ellis, N. and Fair, A., 2017. A typology of modern slavery offences in the UK. Home Office.

Fargues, É., 2017. The revival of citizenship deprivation in France and the UK as an instance of citizenship renationalisation. Citizenship Studies, 21(8), pp.984-998.

Gill, A.K., Cox, P. and Weir, R., 2018. Shaping Priority Services for UK Victims of Honour?Based Violence/Abuse, Forced Marriage, and Female Genital Mutilation. The Howard Journal of Crime and Justice, 57(4), pp.576-595.

Graca, S., 2017. Domestic violence policy and legislation in the UK: A discussion of immigrant women’s vulnerabilities. European journal of current legal issues, 22(1).

LeBaron, G. and Rühmkorf, A., 2017. Steering CSR through home state regulation: A comparison of the impact of the UK bribery act and modern slavery act on global supply chain governance. Global Policy, 8, pp.15-28.

Mantouvalou, V., 2018. The UK modern slavery act 2015 three years on.

Matulewska, A., 2017. Socially induced changes in legal terminology. Studies in logic, grammar and rhetoric, 49(1), pp.153-173.