Safeguarding in Social Work Practice Assignment Sample

• Type Assignment
• Downloads585
• Pages20
• Words4904

Introduction

Improve your academic performance with Comprehensive Assignment Help for Better Grades, covering essential topics like safeguarding, healthcare policies, and social care.

The study will concentrate on a Serious Case Review (SCR) that exposes the delicate and interrelated nature of safeguarding adults at risk, which is represented in the case of Adult Q. This case was chosen due to its rich complexity that involve different agencies, risk assessment and the ethical dilemmas that underline the safeguarding practice. It acts as fundamental teaching aid involves principles and values of social work, understanding the necessary procedures and know rightful way of reporting an issue. The function of an SCR is to critically examine situations in which a vulnerable person has been harmed or is at risk of harm, to identify what is wrong in the system and establish practices, which in the future will prevent such individuals from harm. This analysis seeks to tease out major themes from the SCR by applying the pertinent laws, values, and social work practice concepts; the results will be used to understand the challenges and approaches to protecting vulnerable persons.

Key Themes and Issues Reported in the Review

The Development of interagency Collaboration and coordination

This theme embodies the core impetus towards the adaptation of designated safeguarding frameworks and responsibilities in protecting vulnerable adults. Despite the SCR showcasing the difficulties and shortcomings in collaborating and working harmoniously across the different agencies, it directly affected the quality of care provided for Adult Q. Such a theme is worth exploring because it would help the students develop a critical mindset towards the process of collaborating and working on different sectors (Gasco-Hernandez, Gil-Garcia and Luna-Reyes, 2022). This is about investigating of how sharing information and collaborating between agencies medical personnel, social services and law enforcement can improve the outcome concerning safety and protection (Becker, 2023). The theme demonstrates the alignment with the learning outcomes aimed at teamwork with colleagues or professionals, service users and carers, and the need for improvements in standard procedures. This can prevent future failure.

Vulnerability and Risk Evaluation

Risk assessment in terms of seriousness and vulnerability is vital to the safeguarding principle (Malgieri and Niklas, 2020). The SCR highlights the challenges of comprehensively measuring and acting on the rapidly changing and multi-layered nature of risk and vulnerability especially where mental health issues, self-neglect, and health complications are also involved. This theme lays a ground for social work theories and values critical integration because it requires a unique vision of people in search of their capacities, vulnerabilities, and circumstances. It fosters critical evaluation of how theoretical frameworks and professional judgment can be used as bases for better risk management assertions and safeguarding intervention decisions (Hung, 2023). Through the exploration of this theme students will be able to identify the contradiction between the demand of respect of privacy as a fundamental human right and the need of safety assurance that is a must for social work practice.

Managing Self-Neglect

The issue of self-neglect on the Adult Q case represents a main issue in social work practice. This is the theme that covers ethical and emotional issues of personal safety, in particular, the need to stay focused on a person-centred philosophy in the process of professional performance. It gives us some concern and raises an essential question about autonomy, capacity and the rights of service users – issues that are central to learning outcomes aimed at acquiring attitudes toward compromised self-determination and the significance of these attitudes in relation to the rights, autonomy, capacity, risk and vulnerability of service users (Ryan and Deci, 2020). The purpose of exploring this theme is for students to analytically consider the abilities and actions required when dealing with individuals who self-neglect, and also what strategies can be used in helping this kind of people while respecting their self-determination.

Whether you’re dealing with nursing theories or clinical practices, our nursing assignment help ensures you get the best support to meet your academic requirements.

Direct Practice Issues

One hidden threat that could exist in the safeguarding arena is the limitation of the resources including the staff and financial constrains (Lexis Alexander Tetteh, Agyenim?Boateng and Nana, 2023). This poses a problem as caseloads of social workers and healthcare professionals can increase drastically and as a result the time and attention that can be paid to each case becomes lower. The resource limitations could have affected the services of the agencies provided to Adult Q by not permitting comprehensive and timely interventions, failure to carry out holistic assessments, and having irregular following-ups. The SCR implies that there were deficiencies in the training and the awareness of staffs involved in the care of Adult Q, especially with complicated cases which are the representation of mental illness, self-neglect, and integration of the physical and mental health services Lack of competency in the required skills may slow down the practitioners in identifying the signs of deterioration in those at-risk adults and giving due responses. The problem stresses the critical importance of continuous professional training and development that meet patients and clients with complex needs (Vázquez-Calatayud, Errasti-Ibarrondo and Choperena, 2021). Efficient communications and information sharing among agencies should be ensured; this is one of the key components of preventing disasters (Fakhruddin et al., 2020). SCR of Adult Q sounded the alarm about flawed processes of information sharing that could have negatively impacted on treatment provision and paved the way for missed chances of intervention. Organizationally, policies and systems why do not support the safe and systematic information sharing process can present the huge challenges to effective multi-agency work and the timely reaction to the emerging risks (Parker et al., 2021).

Culture and mentality determine how risky, exposed to danger, and protected actions are perceived (Mars and Weir, 2020). In certain cases, there could be a culture of risk aversion that affects proactive interventions, or it could be that some workers have bias against mental health issues and self-neglect which affect the decision-making process. These cultural and attitudinal obstacles therefore must be overcome in order to improve the responsiveness so that it would be more person-focused in safeguarding (Davies, 2023).

Latent Organizational Issues

Care Act 2014: This action highlights the role of assessment in some of the major issues while identifying the target’s needs and providing desired care and support (Baginsky, Thomas and Manthorpe, 2022). In the case of Mr. Q, steps were taken to evaluate his needs and modify the care package especially in regards to the time he got in the hospital. Nevertheless, an SCR raises the issue that although the Care Act envisaged an ongoing assessment and personalized care plan, either the assessment or updating of their client's care plan was not adequately reviewed or carried out regularly by the organization and this may reflect a failure to comply with the Care Act's requirements.

Mental Capacity Act 2005: The enactment of this Act serves as the basis for making some decisions on behalf of people who are unable to express their view on certain specific matters (Coggon and Kong, 2021). The analysis of Adult Q case shows there were problems with the proper implementation of the Mental Capacity Act, the most significant ones were linked with assessing Adult Q’s capacity in relation to health care and finances. It may be that capacity assessments were not based on proper investigations or decisions were made in Adult Q's best interests.

Mental Health Act 1983: It seems like that this act was taken into account while responding to the mental health problems of adult Q; and, more importantly, by considering the possibility of utilizing section 135 of the act to force entry in adult Q's home when his health was being worse. Nevertheless, according to SCR, the lagging behind and even the procrastination in using the Mental Health Act as a legal basis for the examination and the necessary psychiatric intervention of P. A. are likely to seen as the failure of mechanisms which intend to ensure the safety of P. A.

Implementing Guidance and Policies Frameworks

Safeguarding Adult Policies: Protection policies are disability mechanisms and security barriers between vulnerable adults and abuse and neglect (Keogh, 2022). The SCR documents Adult Q’s life as it relates to various safeguarding alerts, including financial abuse, self-neglect, and any other safeguarding issues raised. However, the appropriate actions were taken to address these concerns but there was a lack of effectiveness in the interventions carried out and a lack of coordination between agencies involved in the safeguarding process which clearly indicated an insufficient follow-up of safeguarding policies.

Information Sharing and Collaboration: The ability of each agency to communicate information is the key element in safeguarding (Safitra, Lubis and Fakhrurroja, 2023). Adult Q’s case reflects significant communication gaps in this dimension as the information has not been passed on to health services, social care, and the police properly. More likely than not, this absence of efficient communication and coordination prevented the development of a shared grasp of the critical issues and risk associated with the patient, which resulted in the lost opportunities to intervene.

Compliance with Law, Policy, and Practice Guidance

In the case of Adult Q, the act of implementing the relevant law, and policy, and also of adherence to the practice guidance is a complex picture. Care, where some elements were obviously in sync with legal and policy frameworks such as the Care Act 2014, the Mental Capacity Act 2005 and safeguarding guidelines, other essential parts were not aligned with these frameworks in the ground rules. Integration of services in meeting the personal care needs of individuals is a highlight of the 2014 Care Act, though effective interdisciplinary communication and coordination of care in the case of Adult Q seemed challenging (HUGHES, SHAW and GREENHALGH, 2020). Therefore, the shortfall might have made the holistic approach less effective for safeguarding and care coordination. In enabling this approach, the following should be empowered:

Further, the Jury and Probate Department might have neglected to fully employ the Mental Capacity Act 2005 which caters for the protection and support of individuals who are unable to make certain decisions to promote their autonomy while maintaining their safety and well-being in the process (Hale, 2021). The principles of the act require that all realistic attempts are made to allow for individuals to make their own decisions before being declared incapable of doing so, but the review states that the steps, being taken, may not be documented adequately or that the attempts were not made before reaching that conclusion.

Failures or omissions in implementing these legal and policy frameworks were revealed in the inadequacy of the prevention-focused and proactive approach that could have addressed the internal state of being of the elder Q and the risks of self-neglect (Eldridge, Stimac and Vanderkolk, 2021). The agencies were present, and caregiving was delivered in some ways, but coordination and depth of the understanding were absent when they wanted to effectively intervene. This therefore brings up a gap between what the policy aims to achieve and its execution in the ground, thus magnifying the areas that may require improvement in training, communication, and application of the policy in practice.

Good Practice and Professional Knowledge

After detailed description we see that there were people and occasions when the appropriate practice and good professional skills was shown. The presence of Adul Q's dear friend to the early mental health care coordination, and some of the mental health services engagement indicate a dedication to supporting him positively. Nevertheless, these efforts were spasmodic and did not work out systematically and seriously based on a practice framework that was not organized, informed, and used well the available professional knowledge and guidelines.

The case of Adult Q presented with some practice dilemmas which could not be managed with a simple comprehension of his mental and physical health conditions. They needed understanding of his needs, his risks and the complex interplay between the trajectory of these conditions. Having an excellent professional understanding of the management of bipolar disorder, ankylosing spondylitis, and Parkinson's disease should also have been taken on board in formulating a more responsive and individualized care plan (Cinar et al., 2020). This includes identifying when and how care proceeds, how to work with more purpose with the adult Q, and ensuring that care plans remain flexible enough to meet changing needs.

There is neglect of a multidisciplinary and comprehensive review of Adult Q's care plan, particularly in the context of his serious health needs and history of self-neglect, which highlights the gap in the application of good practice principles and usage of professional knowledge to maintain and benefit him. It highlights the need to always continue with professional development, reflective practice, and making a pledge to recognize the lessons from research and guidelines and apply them to day-to-day practice to enable avoidance of such omissions in future.

Equalities and Rights-Centered Practice

Equalities Dimensions

According to the SCR, the interaction of the ideas of multiple areas of equality could havel lead to different systems of care for and relationships with service providers of the adult Q. Also, it is vital to ponder over ageism and the possibility of biased attitudes of the staff concerning individuals with mental health problems, that may have exerted effects on the quality and nature of his care and support. Age-based factors come to the fore in the assessment of risk by health and social service providers, prioritization of the interventions, and the active engagement of older adults with major health issues but without moving to an assisted facility (Bílková, 2023).

Rights-Centered Practice

A rights-based approach to A Q's adult care must centre the idea of his autonomy, dignity, and rightful decision-making even when he is experiencing a decline of physical and mental health. SCR's tale compels the reader to probe the adequacy of the rights and consider some of the complications that arise in dealing with the polarity of his bipolar disorder and the periods of mania and depression that characterize this disorder. The Mental Capacity Act 2005 which protects and promotes the right of individuals who at any time may be unable to make some decisions is one of the crucial components of human-centred practice (Shepherd et al., 2020). The level to which Adult Q could make their own choices as well as being recognized and respected during a crisis period relating to mental health is crucial when assessing the rights-based approach to the practices by the agencies concerned.

Cultural Considerations

The SCR is a guideline and does not explicitly point our at cultural factors, however, we can consider that cultural factors of Adult Q life experiences and personal values were integrated into his care planning and delivery. Cultural competency implies acknowledging and appreciating cultural idiosyncrasies and views of the patients, which can be key factors in their processes of getting involved in the services and perceiving the quality of care (López et al., 2020). Developing and using the story of the life of Adult Q such as years of travels and values low on individualism and high on community participation could have made care more targeted and efficient.

Identification of key messages and practice imperatives

The Serious Case Review (SCR) of Adult Q specifically signifies the essentiality of interagency or multidisciplinary cooperation in safeguarding and service provision to vulnerable adults. A unified message which emerged from this review is the importance of regular interaction and cooperation between different service providers in healthcare, including health clinics, social work departments, mental health agencies, and community coordination groups (Rahimi et al., 2022). The SCR underlines how communications, coordination, and a mutual understanding of needs of the patient were lacking and that could have hindered opportunities for intervention and support, and as such affect the quality of care and the patient's well-being.

The principles emerging SCR in this aspect sheds light on the urgency of re-energizing the cooperation mechanisms to range more that information sharing (Gibson et al., 2019). Workers must be endowed with the necessary skills and knowledge to operate in inter-professional teams, and have the ability to understand the roles and contributions of different providers and how these can be used in a coordination mode to cater for the individual needs like Adult Q.

Interagency or Multidisciplinary Work

The case exemplifies the significance of having step-by-step guidelines in regard to the escalation and decision-making processes among state structures as well as across them, so that there is a coherent care approach for the individual. This involves not only developing the necessary institutional conditions but also creating a common ground for professionals coming from different backgrounds and aces.

Training and development that are multidisciplinary in nature and held frequently enables practitioners to gain the required expertise in this area thus facilitating a more unified and effective attitude in safeguarding the vulnerable adults (Bowman, Suarez and Weiss, 2021). Furthermore, the use of technology as a tool to ease communication as well as the sharing of data is a great weapon in the enhancement of a multidisciplinary approach.

Power and Authority Dynamics

One major aspect of the assurance package that concerns adult Q is the events before his death in 2016, hence most of it covers recent issues regarding child protection and social care. The review spreads over a critical point in the life of Adult Q, especially on the months when his health and well-being was seen to be rapidly yowling down. Though the review is heavily centered on the historical context of Adult Q relationships with various service providers, it focuses particularly on the immediate settings, participants' decisions, and the actions taken or not taken by the relevant agencies in the time leading up to his death. Individual practitioners within the SCR do not seem to be held accountable through the systemic and procedural shortcomings; instead, they are subject to blame. Whereas this approach emphasizes that deficient service and coordination systems contributed to the bad outcome, it is not the only aspect to be considered.

Accountability and Risk Management

Within the review, risk assessment and risk management have a significant presence. The SCR evaluates how efficiently the risk processes for Adult Q have been carried out to address Adult Q's complexity. At the same time, criticisms arise over the lack of adjustment in risk assessments, as evident in the fact that population Q's state worsens through negligence and his advancing psychological disorder. In addition, risk management strategies employed were reactive and fragmented, not communicative and had coordination gaps across the agencies (Ogra et al., 2021). The fact that these resulted in some workforce practices which in turn exposed him to the health and safety risks influenced his decision to find other alternatives of employment. The criticism highlights the necessity of more efficient, cross-disciplinary evaluations and management frameworks which stress on monitoring and adapting the system to meet the evolving needs of the vulnerable adults.

Analysis of observations about the networks and team-around-the-service user

An attempt to get the service user's views and perspectives had been prominent in the Serious Case Review (SCR) for Adult Q, although the rates of the success were scattered. In Adult Q's experience of different service he was being enquired about his wishes and preferences mainly in cases of care and accommodation arrangements. That goes to show that it was obvious that his friend Miss Y played a crucial role in her teacher and advancing Adult Q’s voice, to some extent. Nevertheless, this study ascertains that such strategies might have missed the mark in some instances, particularly during times of severe mental health crises, since they were not sufficiently systematic and effective in completely understanding and responding to Adul tooth's specific requirements and preferences. The fact that the Adult Q's view was not included in his care plan in spite of the challenges it presents is an indication that there are broader issues with regard to safeguarding since the overlapping mental health issues and self-neglect can make it difficult for service user views to be incorporated and acted upon.

Concerning the social networks and team around the service user, the SCR mentions Adult Q's community supporters, which are represented by friends and members of the local church who were close to the patient. These people were not only the emotional companions but also helped with the practical things. Nevertheless, the review observes that there should be better coordination and communication between these informal networks and formal care givers. Although the networks were available, they did not show a coordinated, multi-discipline, if the approach was more systematic and organizational, the team around the service user would have accomplished the task better. Observations claim that although the individual members of Adult Q’s network were dedicated to his well-being, systemic and organizational barriers may have impeded the effective performance of this 'team around the service user. This also highlights the inter-dependency of formal and informal support and care networks and the need to coordinate then in enabling safeguarding and care for the vulnerable.

Socio-Political and Economic Influences

Socio-Political Influences

Healthcare Policy and Funding: The environment of the healthcare system which is brought about by the influence of policy reforms and funding shortage has a major effect to the quality of service and being able to deliver coordinated and comprehensive care (Fang et al., 2020). Adult Q's situation may have differed from others due to the limited ability of service providers to give individualized, continuous help which can arise from higher-level policy decisions that affect resource availability, staffing levels, or accessibility of services.

Mental Health Services Evolution: The still-forming landscape of mental health care in the attempt to incorporate mental health into the comprehensive health care system completely reflects the social-political force which is pushing for a better recognition and treatment of mental health issues (Kohrt et al., 2020). The on-the-ground implementation of this policy, has been proven difficult, as portrayed in the life of an adult in the Q-4 group, because of implementation challenges and still prevalent stigmatization about mental illness.

Legislative Frameworks: The fact that the implementation of key legislation such as the Care Act 2014 and the Mental Capacity Act 2005 depends very much on the socio-political environment which in itself determines the level of understanding and application of the laws by professionals (Kelly and Donnelly, 2023). Through the SCR it has been seen that implementation of the frameworks might create challenges and complexities that also tend to influence the quality of care and protection.

Economic Influences

Austerity and Budget Cuts: The UK economy, conditioned by austerity means and budget cuts, has a very strong influence on social care and health services quality and sufficiency (Webb, Bennett and Bywaters, 2022). In the case of Adult Q, this would mean a decrease in accessibility to critical services, an increase in waiting time for their assistance and a shift to a greater dependence on informal care networks.

Social Inequality and Access to Care: Economic aspects too bring social differences that determine the accessibility to healthcare for certain groups (Tisdell, 2020). Vulnerable persons who live in poor economic classes may also face some difficulties in acquiring the necessary total support.

Recommendations

On the base of the critical analysis of SCR (Serious Case Review) idea regarding the Adult Q, anticipated recommendations concerning the gaps and failures in the social protection procedures are in fact correct and necessary with respect to the systemic improvements. Coordination and communication among multiple agencies must be improved if we are to ensure that similar vulnerabilities of an adult are also attended to and there is a system of information flow among all the stakeholders involved in their welfare. Addressing the requirement of risk assessment and management processes is also essential because it develops the ability to be flexible and dynamic in addressing to the changing needs and conditions of individuals so that interventions happen at the right time and are successful. Additionally, the integration of the service user's perspective into care planning and decision-making processes enhances user autonomy and guarantees that the care is really person-centred, which meets the individual needs and preferences of service users (Nykänen, 2020). The empowerment of support networks for vulnerable adults, either formal or informal, agrees that these networks are the tools around which complete support is built. These recommendations will make the system better if they're implemented correctly, and it will be more reactive, coordinated, and attuned to the complexity of individual clients' needs.

References

• Baginsky, M., Thomas, E. and Manthorpe, J. (2022). The Coronavirus Act’s Easements to the Care Act 2014: A Pragmatic Response or a Red Herring? The British Journal of Social Work, 5(2). doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcac009.
• Becker, G.S. (2023). Crime and Punishment: An Economic Approach. Journal of Political Economy, 76(2), pp.169–217.
• Bílková, V. (2023). Age-based triage and human rights. Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights, 41(1), pp.13–34. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/09240519231151943.
• Bowman, K.S., Suarez, V.D. and Weiss, M.J. (2021). Standards for Interprofessional Collaboration in the Treatment of Individuals With Autism. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 14(4). doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-021-00560-0.
• Cinar, F.I., Sinan, O., Yilmaz, S., Bagcivan, G., Aydogan, I., Yalcin, A.G., Tekgoz, E. and Cinar, M. (2020). Use of complementary and alternative medicine in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. European Journal of Rheumatology, 5(2). doi:https://doi.org/10.5152/eurjrheum.2020.20111.
• Coggon, J. and Kong, C. (2021). FROM BEST INTERESTS TO BETTER INTERESTS? VALUES, UNWISDOM AND OBJECTIVITY IN MENTAL CAPACITY LAW. The Cambridge Law Journal, 80(2), pp.245–273. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/s0008197321000283.
• Davies, C.T. (2023). Promoting healthy relationships: a whole-community approach. [online] bristoluniversitypressdigital.com. Available at: https://bristoluniversitypressdigital.com/display/book/9781447362692/ch006.xml [Accessed 22 Feb. 2024].
• Eldridge, H., Stimac, J. and Vanderkolk, J. (2021). The benefits of errors during training. Forensic Science International: Synergy, 5(2), p.100207. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsisyn.2021.100207.
• Fakhruddin, B., Clark, H., Robinson, L. and Hieber-Girardet, L. (2020). Should I stay or should I go now? Why risk communication is the critical component in disaster risk reduction. Progress in Disaster Science, 8(2), p.100139. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pdisas.2020.100139.
• Fang, E.F., Xie, C., Schenkel, J.A., Wu, C., Long, Q., Cui, H., Aman, Y., Frank, J., Liao, J., Zou, H., Wang, N.Y., Wu, J., Liu, X., Li, T., Fang, Y., Niu, Z., Yang, G., Hong, J., Wang, Q. and Chen, G. (2020). A research agenda for ageing in China in the 21st century (2nd edition): Focusing on basic and translational research, long-term care, policy and social networks. Ageing Research Reviews, [online] 64(2), p.101174. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arr.2020.101174.
• Gasco-Hernandez, M., Gil-Garcia, J.R. and Luna-Reyes, L.F. (2022). Unpacking the role of technology, leadership, governance and collaborative capacities in inter-agency collaborations. Government Information Quarterly, 39(3), p.101710. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2022.101710.
• Gibson, R.B., Peloffy, K., Horen Greenford, Daniel, Doelle, M., Damon, M.H., Holz, C., Staples, K., Wiseman, B. and Grenier, F. (2019). From Paris to Projects: Clarifying the Implications of Canada’s Climate Change Mitigation Commitments for the Planning and Assessment of Projects and Strategic Undertakings (Full Report). [online] Ssrn.com. Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3511932 [Accessed 22 Feb. 2024].
• Hale, L. (2021). Spider Woman: A Life – by the former President of the Supreme Court. [online] Google Books. Random House. Available at: https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=z8cSEAAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PT7&dq=Further [Accessed 22 Feb. 2024].
• HUGHES, G., SHAW, S.E. and GREENHALGH, T. (2020). Rethinking Integrated Care: A Systematic Hermeneutic Review of the Literature on Integrated Care Strategies and Concepts. The Milbank Quarterly, [online] 98(2), pp.446–492. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0009.12459.
• Hung, P.H. (2023). The Influence of Cultural, Legal and Institutional Factors on Auditors’ Roles, Responsibilities and Perceptions of Audit Quality. European Journal of Theoretical and Applied Sciences, [online] 1(5), pp.1131–1145. doi:https://doi.org/10.59324/ejtas.2023.1(5).99.
• Kelly, B.D. and Donnelly, M. (2023). Routledge Handbook of Mental Health Law. Routledge eBooks. api.taylorfrancis.com. doi:https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003226413.
• Keogh, L. (2022). Policy for the Protection and Welfare of Vulnerable Adults and the Management of Allegations of Abuse Revision: F Department: Service User Protection and Welfare committees Dublin and Limerick/North Tipperary No: DOCS 020. [online] Available at: https://avista.ie/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/DOCS-020-Policy-for-the-Protection-and-Welfare-of-Vulnerable-Adults-and-Management-of-Allegations-of-Abuse-2.pdf.
• Kohrt, B.A., Ottman, K., Panter-Brick, C., Konner, M. and Patel, V. (2020). Why we heal: The evolution of psychological healing and implications for global mental health. Clinical Psychology Review, 82(2), p.101920. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2020.101920.
• Lexis Alexander Tetteh, Agyenim?Boateng, C. and Nana, S. (2023). Institutional pressures and accountability processes in pursuit of sustainable development goals: Insights from Ghanaian indigenous oil companies. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 5(2). doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2554.
• López, S.R., Ribas, A.C., Sheinbaum, T., Santos, M.M., Benalcázar, A., Garro, L. and Kopelowicz, A. (2020). Defining and assessing key behavioral indicators of the Shifting Cultural Lenses model of cultural competence. Transcultural Psychiatry, 57(4), pp.594–609. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1363461520909599.
• Malgieri, G. and Niklas, J. (2020). Vulnerable data subjects. Computer Law & Security Review, 37(2), p.105415. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2020.105415.
• Mars, G. and Weir, D.T.H. (2020). Risk Management: Volume I: Theories, Cases, Policies and Politics. [online] Google Books. Routledge. Available at: https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=skEiEAAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA127&dq=Culture+and+mentality+determine+how+risky [Accessed 22 Feb. 2024].
• Nykänen, P. (2020). Shared decision making in the social services? Reasons to consider when choosing methods for service user participation. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 26(2), pp.569–574. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/jep.13323.
• Ogra, A., Donovan, A., Adamson, G., Viswanathan, K.R. and Budimir, M. (2021). Exploring the gap between policy and action in Disaster Risk Reduction: A case study from India. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 63(4), p.102428. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102428.
• Parker, S., Hartley, J., Beashel, J. and Vo, Q. (2021). Leading for public value in multi-agency collaboration. Public Policy and Administration, 38(1), p.095207672199949. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0952076721999490.
• Rahimi, M., Navimipour, N.J., Hosseinzadeh, M., Moattar, M.H. and Darwesh, A. (2022). Cloud healthcare services: A comprehensive and systematic literature review. Transactions on Emerging Telecommunications Technologies, 5(2). doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/ett.4473.
• Ryan, R.M. and Deci, E.L. (2020). Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation from a self-determination Theory perspective: Definitions, theory, practices, and Future Directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, [online] 61(1), pp.1–11. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101860.
• Safitra, M.F., Lubis, M. and Fakhrurroja, H. (2023). Counterattacking Cyber Threats: A Framework for the Future of Cybersecurity. Sustainability, [online] 15(18), p.13369. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/su151813369.
• Shepherd, E., Hoyle, V., Lomas, E., Flinn, A. and Sexton, A. (2020). Towards a human-centred participatory approach to child social care recordkeeping. Archival Science, 20(4), pp.307–325. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-020-09338-9.
• Tisdell, C.A. (2020). Economic, social and political issues raised by the COVID-19 pandemic. Economic Analysis and Policy, 68(1). doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2020.08.002.
• Vázquez-Calatayud, M., Errasti-Ibarrondo, B. and Choperena, A. (2021). Nurses’ continuing professional development: A systematic literature review. Nurse Education in Practice, [online] 50(50), p.102963. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2020.102963.
• Webb, C.J.R., Bennett, D.L. and Bywaters, P. (2022). Austerity, Poverty, and Children’s Services Quality in England: Consequences for Child Welfare and Public Services. Social Policy and Society, 5(2), pp.1–22. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/s147474642200001x.