Exploring Facilitators and Barriers to Health and Social Care Interventions Assignment Sample

• Type Assignment
• Downloads759
• Pages8

Introduction - Exploring Facilitators and Barriers to Health and Social Care Interventions

Partner with Rapid Assignment Help for affordable, high-quality Assignment Help that exceeds your expectations.

The main focus of this report is to inspect the barriers and facilitators associated with interventions of social and health care. This investigation aims to understand the main factors that decrease the successful implementations that mainly aim to improve the quality of life. It also aims to improve well-being for those who are in need of social and healthcare support.

To make sure the quality of the research use of the CRAAP model has been done. The full form of CRAAP model implies Currency, Relevance, Authority, Accuracy and Purpose. It is a very much well established framework which helps in the identification of the reliability and credibility of the collected sources.

Total five sections are there in this report that includes the introduction of the topic and its background information, the methodology, findings on barriers and health facilitators of healthcare and social care interventions. Then there are implications and lastly the conclusion including the recommendations for improving the health and social care services.

Selection of academic sources

To find out the selected academic source on the topic of “Exploring facilitators and barriers to health and social care interventions” there are some steps to follow. At first some keywords have been identified by relevant keywords from these topics including 'facilitators’, ‘barriers' ', “health and social care” etc. (Kalicum, 2023). Secondly, a relevant database is selected to search options of different search engines like NCBI, PubMed, and Google Scholar etc. After that search strings are developed and the keywords are identified in 1st step (Konstantinou et al. 2020). This search string has been designed to regain studies that explore facilitators and barriers to health and social care inventions. Then the search is conducted and saved (Webb et al. 2021). After that search result has screened and reviewed the full text articles then data was extracted.

CRAAP checklist for the determination for the reliability of the sources

Source 1

Currency: The selected journal was published on 26th April 2022. The primary aim of this research was to identify the barriers and the facilitators of nurses to accessing the clinical supervision and skill of the nurses required to facilitate the clinical supervision. This paper is appropriate for this given topic which suggests that the information would be updated.

Relevance: The selected journal is significantly relevant to the topic of facilitators and barriers of health and social care interventions. It has provided necessary and complete knowledge of the literature about this topic that establishes five key components: definition and models, language of supervision, alternative and parallel mechanism and required skills and time with cost. Nurses were the intended audience in this research journal.

Authority: The main author of the selected journal is Roselyne Masamha. The organizational affiliation of the author was from the Department of Physiological Health Well-being and Social Work, University of Hull, Hull, UK.

Accuracy: This article was well established and written and well structured. The authors have structured these articles with extensive sources. It has provided a clear and summaries structure of literature. In the journal proper methodology has been used for proceeding this research. In this research they reviewed PRISMA-ScR guidelines during the literature review (Masamha et al. 2022). Eighty seven papers were included here and data was collected from each of the papers by standardized form and also they used Seidel’s analytical framework to justify this research work.

Purpose: The purpose of this journal was clear and it has identified the barriers and facilitators to overcome the barriers of clinical supervision. This journal was not biased and it presented the information in such an objective and well framed manner. This article has identified the particular points that were hindered the supervision of health and clinical interventions and also the points that will help to overcome this situation to maintain and established and well-structured interventions.

Source 2

Currency: This aspect defines the timeline of the source. The selected journal was published on 22nd June, 2023. The main aim of this report is to identify the barriers and facilitators of healthcare and social care services. So it is very much important to identify the recent data or trends related to this specific matter.

Relevance: The journal is strongly relevant with the report topic. It suggests a strong connection with the topic, as it directly addresses the environmental and social factors which are influencing the social and health care services. The abstract, introduction and keywords of the journal are related with the objectives of the report. The intended audience are the health workers or shift workers in UK healthcare services who are affected by type 2 diabetes as well. 

Authority: The main author of the journal is Rachel Gibson. The organizational affiliation of the author was “Department of Nutritional Sciences, King's College, and London, UK”.

Accuracy: The selected journal’s methodology, sources of the data and the statistical analysis ensured that the information provided are true with provided evidence. The research methods used in this journal were accurate as well. Evaluation of the reliability of the collected data helped to identify the accuracy regarding the barriers to social and health care facilities (Gibson et al. 2023). There weren't any potential bias sources. Also there were no specific limitations while addressing the factors in maintaining the accuracy in interventions.

Purpose: The intention behind the study was clear. The information was mainly produced to identify the factors influencing the dietary behavior in the shift workers with type 2 diabetes which acts as a barrier in healthcare services including social care too. By this the purpose of the research was also clear. The identified information that confirms that social and environmental cultures are the barriers of the health care services confirms that this was a fact. As the findings contribute to the broader understanding so the author’s point of view was objective.

Source 3

Currency: The selected website was published on 20th January, 2021. The main aim of the website was to explore different theories and barriers for the public and patient involvements in health and social care interventions. The provided information was up to date and extremely relevant to the report topic. It involves the current state of public involvement in different social and healthcare interventions.

Relevance: The website involves a strong relevance with the topic. As it provides information about public and patients involvement in health and social care interventions related to barriers and facilitators in health and social care interventions. The information correctly aligns with the research needs. The intended audience was the public and patients involved in healthcare interventions.

Authority: The main author of the journal provided in the website was Josephine Ocloo. The organizational affiliation of the author was “Centre for Implementation Science, Health Services, Population and Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience (IoPPN), King’s College London, UK”.

Accuracy: The selected website provides up to date data on campaigns of harmed patients which led to strengthening the information about the barriers due to public involvement. The authenticity of information about the increasing awareness between the individuals can be verified by the provided evidence. Also the used tone or language doesn’t seem free from emotions. 

Purpose: The point of view of the authors in this website was clear and objective. This research has been done to identify the benefits and barriers of health and social care interventions among people involved in healthcare facilities. Many theories, barriers regarding this topic have been reviewed by the authors. The main purpose was clear. Also a perceived theory and knowledge gap has been identified about the patient safety and social and health care facilities.

Similarities and differences between 3 sources regarding CRAAP checklist

The CRAAP checklist indicates both similarities and differences between the selected three sources. All the sources are directly related to the topic which addresses factors or barriers influencing the health and social care services (Coventry et al. 2020) .Both of the sources help to understand the barriers faced by the individuals. Also all the sources feature expert authors in their designated fields. These evaluate their credibility and authenticity.

The differences include the published dates of the sources. As one source may provide more up to date information than others (Hendricks-Sturrup et al. 2019). The methodology of the sources is different in each source providing different data accuracy. The primary purposes are different in the sources. As the aims influence the provided insights depth.

Comparison of the findings

From the selected sources it has been identified that there is an active involvement between the public and patients which acts as a key facilitator of health and social interventions. This involves the effectiveness and relevance of the interventions (Mathieson et al. 2019) . The importance of collaboration between different healthcare services and social workers has been identified. A common barrier discussed in all the sources is the limitations of the resources and also the contrast of the budget (Uchendu et al. 2020). All the sources pointed out the resistance as a barrier which implies the adaptation of various intervention strategies to change in health and social care organizations.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the availability of the reliable resources on the facilitators and barriers of health and social care interventions involved a mixed situation. Reliable resources have been found but it required an extensive searching. It varied depending upon the important aspect of health and social care interventions. Though open access to various research papers helped in finding the appropriate academic resources. The CRAAP checklist has been an important tool throughout the report. It has enhanced the significance of the evaluation which has been done critically while getting information about the reliability and quality of the specific sources. By scrutinizing all the aspects it was easy to differentiate between trustworthy and unreliable resources. This checklist also helped in focusing on the up to date information, data from expert authors and free from any kind of biases. Main findings of this research are facilitators including strong leadership and support from different stakeholders, elaborated, clear and well-structured and concise models about the interventions, adequate source and funding, participation of service users and communication among different agencies and their collaboration. This research has identified some barriers like lack of source, poor communication, lack of evidence based interventions.

References

Journals

• Coventry, L., Branley-Bell, D., Sillence, E., Magalini, S., Mari, P., Magkanaraki, A. and Anastasopoulou, K., 2020, July. Cyber-risk in healthcare: Exploring facilitators and barriers to secure behaviour. In International conference on human-computer interaction (pp. 105-122). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
• Gibson, R., D'Annibale, M., Oliver, N., McGowan, B., Forbes, G., Crayton, E., Guess, N. and Lorencatto, F., 2023. Exploration of the individual, social and environmental factors influencing dietary behaviour in shift workers with type 2 diabetes working in UK healthcare—The Shift?Diabetes Study: A qualitative study using the theoretical domains framework. Diabetic Medicine, p.e15179. [Journal 2]
• Hendricks-Sturrup, R.M., Mazor, K.M., Sturm, A.C. and Lu, C.Y., 2019. Barriers and facilitators to genetic testing for familial hypercholesterolemia in the United States: a review. Journal of personalized medicine, 9(3), p.32.
• Kalicum, J., 2023. “We need all the help we can get”: A Qualitative Examination of Service Provider Perspectives on the Barriers and Facilitators to the Implementation of The Emergency Risk Mitigation Guidelines (Doctoral dissertation).
• Konstantinou, P., Kassianos, A.P., Georgiou, G., Panayides, A., Papageorgiou, A., Almas, I., Wozniak, G. and Karekla, M., 2020. Barriers, facilitators, and interventions for medication adherence across chronic conditions with the highest non-adherence rates: a scoping review with recommendations for intervention development. Translational behavioral medicine, 10(6), pp.1390-1398.
• Masamha, R., Alfred, L., Harris, R., Bassett, S., Burden, S. and Gilmore, A., 2022. ‘Barriers to overcoming the barriers': A scoping review exploring 30 years of clinical supervision literature. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 78(9), pp.2678-2692. [Journal 1]
• Mathieson, A., Grande, G. and Luker, K., 2019. Strategies, facilitators and barriers to implementation of evidence-based practice in community nursing: a systematic mixed-studies review and qualitative synthesis. Primary health care research & development, 20, p.e6.
• Uchendu, C., Windle, R. and Blake, H., 2020. Perceived facilitators and barriers to nigerian nurses’ engagement in health promoting behaviors: a socio-ecological model approach. International journal of environmental research and public health, 17(4), p.1314.
• Webb, R., Uddin, N., Ford, E., Easter, A., Shakespeare, J., Roberts, N., Alderdice, F., Coates, R., Hogg, S., Cheyne, H. and Ayers, S., 2021. Barriers and facilitators to implementing perinatal mental health care in health and social care settings: a systematic review. The Lancet Psychiatry, 8(6), pp.521-534.

Website

[Retrieved from: https://health-policy-systems.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12961-020-00644-3] [Retrieved on: 18.10.2023]