The Psychology of Independent Behavior & Obedience Assignment Sample

• Type Assignment
• Downloads1962
• Pages5
• Words1203

Introduction

Elevate your academic performance with our personalized Assignment Helper, created to help you excel in every subject.

Fill in the blanks

Independent behavior refers to the ability to resist pressures to make the confirmation in the role to a majority, or resisting pressures to obey the orders given by an authority figure. 

The variations Solomon Asch (1950s) has made to his original line experiment revealed situations where participants were less or more likely to get participants and were more likely to behave independently:

Size of the majority: when the group area was reduced to just two (the participant and one confederate) there was almost blank conformity. Groups with three or more confederates showed the largest rates of conformity. This shows that in confidence in groups it is easier to behave independently.

Nature of the task: when the task was made more psychological by making the three lines shown to participants closer together, conformity rates with the task of the performances. This shows that when a task is more judgmental people are more likely to follow what others say. 

Ethical issues founded in the study

The Asch investigation is a very significant article to confront such ethical issues. This study has included such ethical issues of informed consent. Since such respondents have been informed their investigation has been concerned sensory perceptions instead of normative effect.

In the study of Milgram (1963), several ethical issues have been found that are “deceptions, protection of participants involved and the right to withdrawal”. Since these volunteers have been persuaded to assume individuals involved providing shocks to actual individuals, this investigation is considered immoral.

Scan QR code from mobile camera

Grab an Extra 10% OFF on WhatsApp order!

use discount

The experiment of Zimbardo (1970) has included many ethical concerns, such as the lack of fully informed consent by participants and presented such unpredictable consequences when the prisoner arrested the individual. 

Task 2: Essay Question: Critical Research on

Things gain from Asch study 

Asch's compliance studies have been among the most well-known in psychology's history, and they have inspired numerous follow-up studies on social behavior and conformity. These studies have provided researchers with a better understanding of where, why, and when individuals comply, as well as the effects of such social influence on behavior. High School Assignment Help Some of the most common critiques of Asch's conformity studies are that they fail to fully explain why people choose to comply. Critics argue that participants may have been motivated by a desire to avoid conflict rather than a genuine sense of agreement with the group. Another criticism is that the results of such laboratory experiments may not be applicable to real-life situations. In these conformity experiments, about 75% of participants conformed to the group at least once. The research also found that increasing the size of the group influenced the rate of conformity.

This had almost little effect upon respondents' responses whenever only each additional experimenter had been presented. That arrival of three allies produced barely a little impact. When two or maybe fewer confederates were present, their compliance remained significantly higher. Asch additionally discovered when making several of the confederates guess correctly whereas its remainder of such confederates respond incorrectly reduced cooperation significantly. Only Five about ten percent of such respondents within that circumstance adhered to such an entire population. Asch then proceeded to run other tests to see what elements impacted whether and where individuals conformed. The discovered elements are following:

Whenever there are additional individuals around, uniformity usually increases. When overall grouping membership exceeds three to six persons, nevertheless, minimal changes.

Whenever its work grows increasingly challenging, compliance rises as well. When faced with uncertainties, individuals seek advice from another regarding whether to behave.

Whenever additional participants have a better societal position, compliance rises. Individuals who are greater inclined will follow their grouping if individuals believe many individuals represent that society is greater wealthy, prominent, or experienced what individuals seem to be.

Things gain from Milgram study

To appreciate whether research resembling these had been conducted throughout the initial place, people must firstly comprehend what compliance has been characterized. Many definitions describe devotion as yielding to a further’s desire or directives, while certain definitions might describe respect slightly. Milgram (1963) conducted research on authoritative persons' compliance. He hoped to demonstrate whether humanity's impact, although minor, may have a significant impact on a participant's behavior throughout that operation. Milgram associated greatly with psychological hardship of "European Jews" as well as became affected with Asch's conformance study. That article advances severe moral problems about what studies have been conducted. Milgram's research presents severe moral concerns about ways studies were conducted. Moreover illustration, this same reality that this same experiments which has been held at "Yale" but also that this same institution's identity has been used once recruiting helpers could had also provided prospective attendees a greater understanding of safety, leading them to believe that one‘s emotional necessities would've been met because Yale has been richly along with individuals packaged something. Many subjects have been misled regarding this report's specific purpose, rendering it difficult for them to provide proper understanding permission. Their individuals were put through a lot of strain as a result of the deceit. Those individuals did never have that option to leave at each and every point.

Whenever participants expressed a desire to quit, individuals have been pushed to proceed. These respondents clearly suffered ethical as well as psychological pressure as a result of such painful sensations that they believed they might perceive through those instructors, but many began to adapt by utilizing defense measures. This included attempting to assist their learner through placing an emphasis point upon this true response while pronouncing this out loud, and perhaps prompting the learner to reconsider the answers provided. Several of the respondents downplayed whatever had occurred with its targets, including avoiding leaving light upon for sure more than this could have been. This indicates potential individuals have never been safeguarded across every sort to damage which may occur during research, although every individual was adequately properly informed once that exam was completed. Although that investigation constituted indeed immoral owing towards their absence of regard for their individuals' psychological health throughout as well as following that trial, investigations including that were the basis that we currently possess extremely rigorous guidelines about whether investigations might well get conducted out as well as which kind of tests should always get undertaken. Although this investigation seemed defective through its execution as well as the findings were challenged, they demonstrate which individuals as individuals might never necessarily obey their personal ethical convictions.

References 

Journal 

• Bridgman, T. and Cummings, S., 2022. How Ideology Shapes What We Teach about Authority: A Comparative Analysis of the Presentation of Milgram's Experiments in Textbooks. Academy of Management Learning & Education, (ja).
• Keizer, K. and Schultz, P.W., 2018. Social norms and pro?environmental behaviour. Environmental psychology: An introduction, pp.179-188.
• Laurens, S. and Ballot, M., 2021. “We must continue.” The strange appearance of “we” instead of “you” in the prods of the Milgram experiment. Journal of Theoretical Social Psychology, 5(4), pp.556-563.
• McLeod, S., 2018. Solomon Asch-Conformity Experiment. Simply Psychology.
• Qin, X., Chen, C., Yam, K.C., Cao, L., Li, W., Guan, J., Zhao, P., Dong, X. and Lin, Y., 2022. Adults still can't resist: A social robot can induce normative conformity. Computers in Human Behavior, 127, p.107041.